I set my ISO to 100 a took a few pics, playing around with the other settings. It looked like a shutter speed of 1/100 was giving the best results but it was hard to tell. One of the hardest things under these conditions is to actually be able to see the image after I've taken it so I couldn't actually tell if I was getting what I wanted. That's when I turned to our friend Auto.
When I dialed to fully auto and snapped the pic, here's what I got:

I'm facing almost directly away from the sun and the camera used the settings ISO400, f/16.0, 1/500 shutter speed.
I was surprised that the camera was using an ISO of 400 in bright light! To compensate, it upped the shutter speed a lot. I'm now wondering if high shutter speed takes priority in bright conditions rather than ISO sensitivity.
One of the manual shots I did take had different settings but appeared to be similar in result to the camera's suggested settings:

The manual settings were ISO100, f/13.0, 1/200 shutter speed. Pretty damn close to the auto pic. I like that the auto settings used a faster shutter speed so that the pic would be able to stand some shaking. The lens I used for these was a 17-85mm with IS so I would have been able to stand some significant shaking which my espresso-ridden body may have been doing. :) I'll need to look closer at the full res images of these two to see if there is anything that tips the scale in favour of ISO vs shutter speed.
In some of the pictures I took on manual settings, the sky looked a darker blue, which would be sort of false for today. The camera's auto suggestions seemed to capture things pretty well. Here's one of the cranes in the bay:

Notice the false dark colour of the sky. The settings were ISO100, f/13.0, 1/500 shutter speed.

No comments:
Post a Comment